Executive Advisor · Life Sciences & Biotech
Caroline E. Jones
Shaping Our Industry · Clinical Trials Sourcing Strategy, 2026
Strategy, operations, and leadership clarity for life sciences and biotech leaders. Stanford and Gilead, on both sides of the table.
Start a conversation
Cycle time
Start-up is the longest and least predictable phase of a trial. Most of that time is a design problem, not an effort problem.
What changes
Not a report and not a framework. Three conditions that change, and stay changed once she leaves.
Start-up stops being the phase nobody will forecast. Sourcing gets decided at portfolio level, and the cycle times go in the board deck without a caveat.
Plans that survive contact with the people who have to live inside them, rather than being agreed in the room and routed around afterward.
Senior teams that can make the call, because someone in the room has sat on both sides of the agreement and knows where the room to move is.
Engagements
Is this a design problem, or an effort problem?
Start-up acceleration, sourcing design, vendor selection, and transition management for sponsors running global trials. Portfolio-level design, not study-by-study firefighting.
Project or retainer
Prosci-based change execution for migrations, vendor transitions, reorganizations, and integrations. The plan is the easy part. Adoption is the question.
Project engagements
Ongoing counsel to senior leaders. Operating decisions, organizational design, negotiation strategy, and the calls that cannot be made in a staff meeting.
Monthly retainer · Limited availability
Track record
Strategy is easy to describe and hard to hold at scale. This is the scale it was held at.
Presented publicly at Shaping Our Industry, 2026.
Speaking
Most sessions on trial operations stay at the level of principle. These bring the case study, the benchmarks, and the trade-offs it took to get them.
Why sourcing design at portfolio level moves start-up further than any amount of execution effort.
Sixty-five studies and 1,650 sites in six months. The structure, the real risks, and the noise.
Why change fails on adoption rather than design, and what leaders can do about resistance nobody says out loud.
About
I have negotiated for a research university and for a global biotech. I have sat on both sides of the same agreement and I know where the room to move actually is.
Six years at Stanford across medicine, engineering, and law, with signing authority for the Board of Trustees. Eight years at Gilead as Global Head of Clinical Contracts, Pricing and Payments, leading fifty people across eight countries. Before that, semiconductors, a security installation division, and two years running operations for the Air Force at Ramstein.
The plan is rarely the problem. What breaks is the space between the plan and the people who have to live inside it.
I am also trained in somatic work, which sounds like a departure and is not. Reorganizations do not get resisted in a spreadsheet. People absorb change in their bodies first and explain it later.
A limited number of one-to-one executive coaching engagements are available to advisory clients.
Start here
If it is not a fit, I will say so and point you somewhere better.
Start a conversationSan Francisco Bay Area · Available globally